Xeon X5670 vs Ultra 7 155H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
16.38
+310%

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Xeon X5670 by a whopping 310% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon X5670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4201440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.06
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HXeon (Desktop)
Power efficiency53.243.83
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$503$67

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon X5670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2212
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.33 GHz
Bus rateno data6400 MHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data239 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C81 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon X5670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA2049FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon X5670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon X5670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon X5670 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon X5670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3
Maximum memory size96 GB288 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.25 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon X5670 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon X5670 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon X5670 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon X5670.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes8no data
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 16.38
+310%
Xeon X5670 4.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25009
+310%
Xeon X5670 6104

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ultra 7 155H 9874
+167%
Xeon X5670 3698

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ultra 7 155H 58357
+192%
Xeon X5670 19954

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ultra 7 155H 13064
+125%
Xeon X5670 5794

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ultra 7 155H 32
+320%
Xeon X5670 8

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.38 4.00
Recency 14 December 2023 16 March 2010
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 22 12
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 95 Watt

Ultra 7 155H has a 309.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 83.3% more threads, and 239.3% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5670 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 155H is a notebook processor while Xeon X5670 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Xeon X5670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Xeon X5670
Xeon X5670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 453 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 473 votes

Rate Xeon X5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Xeon X5670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.