Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Ultra 7 155H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.81
Ryzen AI 9 365
2024
10 cores / 20 threads, 28 Watt
17.97
+13.7%

Ryzen AI 9 365 outperforms Core Ultra 7 155H by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen AI 9 365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking433344
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency53.4060.70
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Strix Point (2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)July 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$503no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen AI 9 365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads2220
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm4 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °C100 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen AI 9 365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 2049FP8
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen AI 9 365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen AI 9 365 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen AI 9 365 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen AI 9 365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)AMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen AI 9 365.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 15.81
Ryzen AI 9 365 17.97
+13.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25119
Ryzen AI 9 365 28545
+13.6%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ultra 7 155H 9828
+16.4%
Ryzen AI 9 365 8446

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ultra 7 155H 56242
+23.7%
Ryzen AI 9 365 45453

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ultra 7 155H 13031
Ryzen AI 9 365 14361
+10.2%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ultra 7 155H 3.61
+85.6%
Ryzen AI 9 365 6.7

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ultra 7 155H 30
Ryzen AI 9 365 31
+2.8%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 7 155H 2385
Ryzen AI 9 365 2403
+0.8%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ultra 7 155H 255
Ryzen AI 9 365 298
+16.9%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ultra 7 155H 3.07
Ryzen AI 9 365 3.55
+15.6%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ultra 7 155H 10.2
Ryzen AI 9 365 12.6
+23%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ultra 7 155H 7084
Ryzen AI 9 365 11937
+68.5%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ultra 7 155H 128
+32.3%
Ryzen AI 9 365 97

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ultra 7 155H 296
+14.4%
Ryzen AI 9 365 259

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 7 155H 12184
Ryzen AI 9 365 13009
+6.8%

Blender(-)

Ultra 7 155H 222
Ryzen AI 9 365 232
+4.5%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ultra 7 155H 1764
Ryzen AI 9 365 2080
+17.9%

7-Zip Single

Ultra 7 155H 5398
Ryzen AI 9 365 5928
+9.8%

7-Zip

Ultra 7 155H 60595
Ryzen AI 9 365 65071
+7.4%

WebXPRT 3

Ultra 7 155H 278
Ryzen AI 9 365 322
+15.8%

CrossMark Overall

Ultra 7 155H 1687
Ryzen AI 9 365 1696
+0.5%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ultra 7 155H 255
Ryzen AI 9 365 259
+1.6%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ultra 7 155H 391
+30.3%
Ryzen AI 9 365 300

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ultra 7 155H 12385
Ryzen AI 9 365 14118
+14%

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Ultra 7 155H 2409
Ryzen AI 9 365 2814
+16.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.81 17.97
Integrated graphics card 18.48 20.07
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 22 20
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm

Ultra 7 155H has 60% more physical cores and 10% more threads.

Ryzen AI 9 365, on the other hand, has a 13.7% higher aggregate performance score, 8.6% faster integrated GPU, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 155H in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen AI 9 365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Ryzen AI 9 365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 561 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 42 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Ryzen AI 9 365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.