Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ultra 7 155H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.81
+43.5%
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
11.02

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Ryzen 7 2700X by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen 7 2700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking433709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency53.409.93
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$503$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen 7 2700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2216
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.35 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache112 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen 7 2700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketIntel BGA 2049AM4
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen 7 2700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen 7 2700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen 7 2700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen 7 2700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen 7 2700X.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 15.81
+43.5%
Ryzen 7 2700X 11.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25119
+43.5%
Ryzen 7 2700X 17509

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ultra 7 155H 9828
+87%
Ryzen 7 2700X 5256

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ultra 7 155H 56242
+61.8%
Ryzen 7 2700X 34763

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ultra 7 155H 13031
+22.4%
Ryzen 7 2700X 10643

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ultra 7 155H 3.61
Ryzen 7 2700X 3.48
+3.7%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ultra 7 155H 30
+60.5%
Ryzen 7 2700X 19

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 7 155H 2385
+35.3%
Ryzen 7 2700X 1762

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ultra 7 155H 255
+45.1%
Ryzen 7 2700X 176

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ultra 7 155H 3.07
+57.4%
Ryzen 7 2700X 1.95

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ultra 7 155H 10.2
Ryzen 7 2700X 10.6
+3.9%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ultra 7 155H 7084
+48.2%
Ryzen 7 2700X 4779

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ultra 7 155H 128
+22.5%
Ryzen 7 2700X 105

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ultra 7 155H 296
+30.6%
Ryzen 7 2700X 227

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 7 155H 12184
+73.5%
Ryzen 7 2700X 7022

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ultra 7 155H 1764
+49.8%
Ryzen 7 2700X 1177

7-Zip Single

Ultra 7 155H 5398
+16.2%
Ryzen 7 2700X 4647

7-Zip

Ultra 7 155H 60595
+32.3%
Ryzen 7 2700X 45814

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.81 11.02
Recency 14 December 2023 19 April 2018
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 22 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 105 Watt

Ultra 7 155H has a 43.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 37.5% more threads, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 2700X in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 155H is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen 7 2700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 561 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2968 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Ryzen 7 2700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.