Celeron U3405 vs Ultra 7 155H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.64
+3537%
Celeron U3405
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.43

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron U3405 by a whopping 3537% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron U3405 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4382985
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Celeron
Power efficiency53.302.28
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$503no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron U3405 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads222
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cache112 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography7 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron U3405 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketIntel BGA 2049BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron U3405. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron U3405 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron U3405 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron U3405. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.051 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron U3405 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron U3405.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 15.64
+3537%
Celeron U3405 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25055
+3563%
Celeron U3405 684

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.64 0.43
Integrated graphics card 18.51 0.77
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 22 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 18 Watt

Ultra 7 155H has a 3537.2% higher aggregate performance score, 2303.9% faster integrated GPU, 700% more physical cores and 1000% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron U3405, on the other hand, has 55.6% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron U3405 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron U3405, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Celeron U3405
Celeron U3405

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 607 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Celeron U3405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Celeron U3405, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.