Celeron N2806 vs Core Ultra 7 155H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N2806 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking380not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-HBay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)1 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N2806 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads222
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography7 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N2806 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N2806. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+no data
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Connectno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N2806 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protectionno data-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N2806 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N2806. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3
Maximum memory size96 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.25 GHz756 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N2806 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported42

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N2806 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N2806 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N2806.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes284
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ultra 7 155H 25052
+5065%
Celeron N2806 485

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron N2806 by 5065% in Passmark.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ultra 7 155H 13097
+996%
Celeron N2806 1195

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron N2806 by 996% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ultra 7 155H 32
+4859%
Celeron N2806 1

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron N2806 by 4859% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ultra 7 155H 2496
+4203%
Celeron N2806 58

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron N2806 by 4203% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ultra 7 155H 255
+881%
Celeron N2806 26

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron N2806 by 881% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2023 1 December 2013
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 22 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 4 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N2806. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron N2806, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Celeron N2806
Celeron N2806

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 284 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 27 votes

Rate Celeron N2806 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Celeron N2806, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.