Celeron J3060 vs Ultra 7 155H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.82
+3579%
Celeron J3060
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.43

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron J3060 by a whopping 3579% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J3060 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4332978
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Celeron
Power efficiency53.476.78
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Airmont (2016)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)15 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$503$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J3060 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads222
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz2.48 GHz
Bus typeno dataIDI
L1 cache112 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J3060 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA2049FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J3060. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J3060 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard+-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J3060 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J3060. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size96 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsno data
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency2.25 GHz700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J3060 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J3060 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J3060 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2+
OpenGL4.6+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J3060.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes84
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data5
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 15.82
+3579%
Celeron J3060 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25131
+3607%
Celeron J3060 678

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.82 0.43
Recency 14 December 2023 15 January 2016
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 22 2
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 6 Watt

Ultra 7 155H has a 3579.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 700% more physical cores and 1000% more threads.

Celeron J3060, on the other hand, has 366.7% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3060 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 155H is a notebook processor while Celeron J3060 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J3060, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Celeron J3060
Celeron J3060

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 560 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 135 votes

Rate Celeron J3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Celeron J3060, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.