Athlon XP-M 1300+ vs Ultra 7 155H
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon XP-M 1300+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 433 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Meteor Lake-H | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Power efficiency | 53.44 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $503 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon XP-M 1300+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 22 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 200 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 11 |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 85 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 110 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 37 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon XP-M 1300+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 2049 | Socket 563 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 16 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon XP-M 1300+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon XP-M 1300+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon XP-M 1300+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon XP-M 1300+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2250 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon XP-M 1300+.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 22 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 16 Watt |
Ultra 7 155H has 1500% more physical cores and 2100% more threads, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon XP-M 1300+, on the other hand, has 75% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon XP-M 1300+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Athlon XP-M 1300+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
