Ryzen Z2 Go vs Ultra 5 245KF

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
24.61
+260%

Core Ultra 5 245KF outperforms Ryzen Z2 Go by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2411130
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation83.37no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiency8.3510.34
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Rembrandt R (2025)
Release date24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 245KF and Ryzen Z2 Go basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Threads148
Base clock speed4.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache192 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache3 MB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography3 nm6 nm
Die size243 mm2no data
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 245KF and Ryzen Z2 Go compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1851no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 245KF and Ryzen Z2 Go. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 245KF and Ryzen Z2 Go technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 245KF and Ryzen Z2 Go are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 245KF and Ryzen Z2 Go. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400no data
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 245KF and Ryzen Z2 Go.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 5 245KF 24.61
+260%
Ryzen Z2 Go 6.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 5 245KF 43412
+260%
Ryzen Z2 Go 12043

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.61 6.83
Recency 24 October 2024 6 January 2025
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 14 8
Chip lithography 3 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 28 Watt

Ultra 5 245KF has a 260.3% higher aggregate performance score, 250% more physical cores and 75% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen Z2 Go, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 346.4% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go in performance tests.

Note that Core Ultra 5 245KF is a desktop processor while Ryzen Z2 Go is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Core Ultra 5 245KF
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
Ryzen Z2 Go

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 82 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Z2 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 5 245KF and Ryzen Z2 Go, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.