EPYC 9355P vs Ultra 5 245K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 5 245K
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.26
EPYC 9355P
2024
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
59.20
+117%

EPYC 9355P outperforms Core Ultra 5 245K by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 5 245K and EPYC 9355P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18219
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation75.6916.93
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency20.8020.16
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Turin (2024)
Release date24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$319$2,998

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 5 245K has 347% better value for money than EPYC 9355P.

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 245K and EPYC 9355P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Threads1464
Base clock speed4.2 GHz3.55 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate159 MHzno data
L1 cache112 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm4 nm
Die size243 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors17,800 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 245K and EPYC 9355P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1851SP5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and EPYC 9355P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 245K and EPYC 9355P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and EPYC 9355P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and EPYC 9355P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.9 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 5 245K and EPYC 9355P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and EPYC 9355P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP4K @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort8K @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and EPYC 9355P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and EPYC 9355P.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 5 245K 27.26
EPYC 9355P 59.20
+117%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 5 245K 43668
EPYC 9355P 94811
+117%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.26 59.20
Physical cores 14 32
Threads 14 64
Chip lithography 3 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 280 Watt

Ultra 5 245K has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 124% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9355P, on the other hand, has a 117.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 128.6% more physical cores and 357.1% more threads.

The EPYC 9355P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 245K in performance tests.

Note that Core Ultra 5 245K is a desktop processor while EPYC 9355P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 5 245K and EPYC 9355P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Core Ultra 5 245K
AMD EPYC 9355P
EPYC 9355P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 43 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 9355P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 5 245K or EPYC 9355P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.