Ultra X9 388H vs Ultra 5 245K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 5 245K
2024, $319
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
24.71
+14.2%
Core Ultra X9 388H
2026
16 cores / 16 threads, 25 Watt
21.64

Core Ultra 5 245K outperforms Core Ultra X9 388H by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking265317
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation77.01no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency8.3536.55
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Panther Lake (2026)
Release date24 October 2024 (1 year ago)5 January 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$319no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra X9 388H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-cores64
Efficient-cores88
Low Power Efficient-coresno data4
Threads1416
Base clock speed4.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate159 MHzno data
L1 cache112 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm3 nm
Die size243 mm2no data
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra X9 388H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1851FCBGA2540
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra X9 388H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNNOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra X9 388H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra X9 388H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra X9 388H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400LPDDR5X-9600
Maximum memory size256 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsIntel® Arc™ B390 GPU
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.9 GHz2.5 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra X9 388H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra X9 388H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra X9 388H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12DirectX 12 Ultimate
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra X9 388H.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2412

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 5 245K 24.71
+14.2%
Ultra X9 388H 21.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 5 245K 43282
+14.2%
Samples: 687
Ultra X9 388H 37904
Samples: 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 5 245K 3850
+20.4%
Ultra X9 388H 3198

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.71 21.64
Recency 24 October 2024 5 January 2026
Physical cores 14 16
Threads 14 16
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 25 Watt

Ultra 5 245K has a 14.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Ultra X9 388H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 14.3% more physical cores and 14.3% more threads, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H in performance tests.

Note that Core Ultra 5 245K is a desktop processor while Core Ultra X9 388H is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Core Ultra 5 245K
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Core Ultra X9 388H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 167 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 14 votes

Rate Core Ultra X9 388H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra X9 388H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.