Ultra 9 275HX vs Ultra 5 245K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 5 245K
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.19
Core Ultra 9 275HX
2025
24 cores / 24 threads, 55 Watt
35.69
+31.3%

Core Ultra 9 275HX outperforms Core Ultra 5 245K by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking208115
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation76.22no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency20.8262.12
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Arrow Lake-HX (2025)
Release date24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$319no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra 9 275HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-cores68
Efficient-cores816
Threads1424
Base clock speed4.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rate159 MHzno data
L1 cache112 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache3 MB (per core)40 MB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)36 MB
Chip lithography3 nm3 nm
Die size243 mm2no data
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra 9 275HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1851FCBGA2114
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra 9 275HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNNOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra 9 275HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra 9 275HX are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra 9 275HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size256 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.9 GHz1.9 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra 9 275HX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra 9 275HX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4K @ 60Hz3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort8K @ 60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra 9 275HX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra 9 275HX.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2024

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 5 245K 27.19
Ultra 9 275HX 35.69
+31.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 5 245K 43616
Ultra 9 275HX 57246
+31.3%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 5 245K 17760
Ultra 9 275HX 25855
+45.6%

7-Zip Single

Ultra 5 245K 6477
Ultra 9 275HX 7027
+8.5%

7-Zip

Ultra 5 245K 77921
Ultra 9 275HX 122818
+57.6%

CrossMark Overall

Ultra 5 245K 2245
+1.1%
Ultra 9 275HX 2221

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ultra 5 245K 318
Ultra 9 275HX 335
+5.3%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ultra 5 245K 216
+57.7%
Ultra 9 275HX 137

Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core

Ultra 5 245K 17575
Ultra 9 275HX 18851
+7.3%

Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core

Ultra 5 245K 3040
Ultra 9 275HX 3101
+2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.19 35.69
Recency 24 October 2024 1 January 2025
Physical cores 14 24
Threads 14 24
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 55 Watt

Ultra 9 275HX has a 31.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, 71.4% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads, and 127.3% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K in performance tests.

Note that Core Ultra 5 245K is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 275HX is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Core Ultra 5 245K
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Core Ultra 9 275HX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 78 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 39 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 275HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 5 245K and Core Ultra 9 275HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.