5 220H vs Ultra 5 245K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 5 245K
2024, $319
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
24.64
+105%
Core 5 220H
2024, $342
12 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
12.02

Core Ultra 5 245K outperforms Core 5 220H by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking260721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation77.2628.28
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency21.1228.62
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Release date24 October 2024 (1 year ago)18 December 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$319$342

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 5 245K has 173% better value for money than 5 220H.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 245K and Core 5 220H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Performance-cores64
Efficient-cores88
Threads1416
Base clock speed4.2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate159 MHzno data
L1 cache112 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm10 nm
Die size243 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 245K and Core 5 220H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1851FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core 5 220H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 245K and Core 5 220H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core 5 220H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core 5 220H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267
Maximum memory size256 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.9 GHz1.5 GHz
Execution Unitsno data80

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 5 245K and Core 5 220H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core 5 220H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core 5 220H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 245K and Core 5 220H.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2416

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 5 245K 24.64
+105%
5 220H 12.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 5 245K 43443
+105%
Samples: 507
5 220H 21192
Samples: 14

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ultra 5 245K 11681
+12.5%
5 220H 10386

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ultra 5 245K 91572
+94.9%
5 220H 46980

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ultra 5 245K 2.98
+809%
5 220H 27.1

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 5 245K 3850
+110%
5 220H 1835

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ultra 5 245K 322
+22.9%
5 220H 262

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ultra 5 245K 16.4
+56.2%
5 220H 10.5

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 5 245K 17760
+78.6%
5 220H 9946

7-Zip Single

Ultra 5 245K 6477
+14%
5 220H 5683

7-Zip

Ultra 5 245K 77921
+61.9%
5 220H 48123

CrossMark Overall

Ultra 5 245K 2245
+25.3%
5 220H 1792

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ultra 5 245K 318
+22.3%
5 220H 260

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ultra 5 245K 216
5 220H 505
+134%

Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core

Ultra 5 245K 17575
+55.8%
5 220H 11280

Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core

Ultra 5 245K 3040
+21.6%
5 220H 2501

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.64 12.02
Recency 24 October 2024 18 December 2024
Physical cores 14 12
Threads 14 16
Chip lithography 3 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 45 Watt

Ultra 5 245K has a 105% higher aggregate performance score, 16.7% more physical cores, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

5 220H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, 14.3% more threads, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 5 220H in performance tests.

Note that Core Ultra 5 245K is a desktop processor while Core 5 220H is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Core Ultra 5 245K
Intel Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 150 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 62 votes

Rate Core 5 220H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 5 245K and Core 5 220H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.