Ryzen 5 PRO 215 vs Ultra 5 226V
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 5 226V outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 215 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 861 | 891 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 65.47 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Lunar Lake (2024) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 24 September 2024 (1 year ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 5 226V and Ryzen 5 PRO 215 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | 4 | no data |
| Low Power Efficient-cores | 4 | no data |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 37 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 192 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 5 226V and Ryzen 5 PRO 215 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 6 MB + 16 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 226V and Ryzen 5 PRO 215. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 5 226V and Ryzen 5 PRO 215 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 226V and Ryzen 5 PRO 215 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 226V and Ryzen 5 PRO 215. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® Arc™ 130V GPU | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.85 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 5 226V and Ryzen 5 PRO 215 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 5 226V and Ryzen 5 PRO 215 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL) | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core Ultra 5 226V and Ryzen 5 PRO 215 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12.2 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 226V and Ryzen 5 PRO 215.
| PCIe version | 5.0 and 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.38 | 10.14 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 6 Watt |
Ultra 5 226V has a 2.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores.
Ryzen 5 PRO 215, on the other hand, has 50% more threads, and 183.3% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Core Ultra 5 226V and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
