Xeon w9-3595X vs Ultra 5 135H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 5 135H
2023
14 cores / 18 threads, 28 Watt
14.28
Xeon w9-3595X
2024
60 cores / 120 threads, 385 Watt
62.95
+341%

Xeon w9-3595X outperforms Core Ultra 5 135H by a whopping 341% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 5 135H and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking50713
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.42
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency48.2315.46
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$342$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 135H and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)60 (Hexaconta-Core)
Performance-coresno data60
Threads18120
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache18 MB (shared)112.5 MB
Chip lithography7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 135H and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 2049FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 135H and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Arc 7-Cores iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes8112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 5 135H 14.28
Xeon w9-3595X 62.95
+341%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 5 135H 22686
Xeon w9-3595X 99993
+341%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.28 62.95
Recency 14 December 2023 24 August 2024
Physical cores 14 60
Threads 18 120
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 385 Watt

Ultra 5 135H has 1275% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has a 340.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 328.6% more physical cores and 566.7% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3595X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 135H in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 5 135H is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3595X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 5 135H and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
Core Ultra 5 135H
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 11 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 135H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 41 vote

Rate Xeon w9-3595X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 5 135H or Xeon w9-3595X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.