Ryzen AI 9 465 vs Ultra 5 135H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 5 135H
2023, $342
14 cores / 18 threads, 28 Watt
12.60
Ryzen AI 9 465
10 cores / 20 threads, 28 Watt
13.03
+3.4%

Ryzen AI 9 465 outperforms Core Ultra 5 135H by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking708676
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.75no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency19.0019.65
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Gorgon Point (2026)
Release date14 December 2023 (2 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$342no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen AI 9 465 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Performance-cores4no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads1820
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache18 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nmno data
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen AI 9 465 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA2049no data
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen AI 9 465. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen AI 9 465 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen AI 9 465 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen AI 9 465. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data
Maximum memory size96 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.2 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen AI 9 465 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen AI 9 465 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen AI 9 465 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen AI 9 465.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 5 135H 12.60
Ryzen AI 9 465 13.03
+3.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ultra 5 135H 9317
+8.9%
Ryzen AI 9 465 8554

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ultra 5 135H 42283
Ryzen AI 9 465 48569
+14.9%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ultra 5 135H 4.73
+122%
Ryzen AI 9 465 10.5

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 5 135H 1718
Ryzen AI 9 465 2695
+56.9%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ultra 5 135H 244
+29.8%
Ryzen AI 9 465 188

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ultra 5 135H 7.3
Ryzen AI 9 465 11.2
+53.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.60 13.03
Physical cores 14 10
Threads 18 20

Ultra 5 135H has 40% more physical cores.

Ryzen AI 9 465, on the other hand, has a 3.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 11.1% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and AMD Ryzen AI 9 465.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
Core Ultra 5 135H
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
Ryzen AI 9 465

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 44 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 135H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 5 135H and Ryzen AI 9 465, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.