FX-6300 vs Ultra 5 125H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 5 125H
2023
14 cores / 18 threads, 28 Watt
13.99
+438%
FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.60

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms FX-6300 by a whopping 438% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 5 125H and FX-6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5291732
Place by popularitynot in top-10058
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.64
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency47.282.59
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375$132

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 125H and FX-6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Performance-cores4no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads186
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)288 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)6144 KB
L3 cache18 MB (shared)8192 KB
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 125H and FX-6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and FX-6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 125H and FX-6300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and FX-6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and FX-6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size96 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.2 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 5 125H and FX-6300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and FX-6300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and FX-6300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and FX-6300.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes28no data
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 5 125H 13.99
+438%
FX-6300 2.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 5 125H 22219
+437%
FX-6300 4137

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.99 2.60
Recency 14 December 2023 23 October 2012
Physical cores 14 6
Threads 18 6
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 95 Watt

Ultra 5 125H has a 438.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 133.3% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and 239.3% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 5 125H is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 5 125H is a notebook processor while FX-6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 5 125H and FX-6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Core Ultra 5 125H
AMD FX-6300
FX-6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 378 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 125H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4189 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 5 125H or FX-6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.