E-450 vs Core Ultra 5 125H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 5 125H and E-450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking460not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-HZacate (2011−2013)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)22 August 2011 (12 years ago)
Current priceno data$125

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 125H and E-450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads182
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz1.65 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache18 MB0 KB
Chip lithography7 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data75 mm2
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 125H and E-450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and E-450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 125H and E-450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and E-450 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and E-450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size96 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsAMD Radeon HD 6320
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency2.2 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 5 125H and E-450 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and E-450 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and E-450 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and E-450.

PCI Express lanes28no data
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ultra 5 125H 22628
+2858%
E-450 765

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms E-450 by 2858% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ultra 5 125H 9335
+779%
E-450 1063

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms E-450 by 779% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ultra 5 125H 48467
+2299%
E-450 2021

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms E-450 by 2299% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ultra 5 125H 13225
+1178%
E-450 1035

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms E-450 by 1178% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ultra 5 125H 9.5
+579%
E-450 64.5

E-450 outperforms Core Ultra 5 125H by 579% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ultra 5 125H 24
+3795%
E-450 1

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms E-450 by 3795% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ultra 5 125H 2.94
+819%
E-450 0.32

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms E-450 by 819% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ultra 5 125H 9
+9844%
E-450 0.1

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms E-450 by 9844% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ultra 5 125H 9592
+1861%
E-450 489

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms E-450 by 1861% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ultra 5 125H 130
+4384%
E-450 3

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms E-450 by 4384% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ultra 5 125H 305
+1788%
E-450 16

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms E-450 by 1788% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2023 22 August 2011
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 18 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 18 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 5 125H and E-450. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 5 125H and E-450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Core Ultra 5 125H
AMD E-450
E-450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 172 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 125H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 467 votes

Rate E-450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 5 125H or E-450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.