Athlon II X4 620 vs Ultra 5 125H

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 5 125H
2023
14 cores / 18 threads, 28 Watt
14.27
+998%
Athlon II X4 620
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.30

Core Ultra 5 125H outperforms Athlon II X4 620 by a whopping 998% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 5 125H and Athlon II X4 620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5222283
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.43
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency47.341.27
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Propus (2009−2011)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)16 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375$65

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 5 125H and Athlon II X4 620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads184
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache18 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data169 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 5 125H and Athlon II X4 620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049AM3
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Athlon II X4 620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 5 125H and Athlon II X4 620 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Athlon II X4 620 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Athlon II X4 620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3
Maximum memory size96 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ graphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.2 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 5 125H and Athlon II X4 620 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Athlon II X4 620 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Athlon II X4 620 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 5 125H and Athlon II X4 620.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes28no data
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 5 125H 14.27
+998%
Athlon II X4 620 1.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 5 125H 22238
+1001%
Athlon II X4 620 2019

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.27 1.30
Recency 14 December 2023 16 September 2009
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 18 4
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 95 Watt

Ultra 5 125H has a 997.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 250% more physical cores and 350% more threads, and 239.3% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 5 125H is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 5 125H is a notebook processor while Athlon II X4 620 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 5 125H and Athlon II X4 620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Core Ultra 5 125H
AMD Athlon II X4 620
Athlon II X4 620

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 344 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 125H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 190 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 5 125H or Athlon II X4 620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.