Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Solo T1400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen 9 6900HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated474
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore Solono data
Power efficiencyno data40.12
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen 9 6900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speed1.83 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm6 nm
Die size90 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen 9 6900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479FP7
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen 9 6900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen 9 6900HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen 9 6900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen 9 6900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen 9 6900HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Solo T1400 253
Ryzen 9 6900HS 23581
+9221%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Solo T1400 95
Ryzen 9 6900HS 5.49
+1630%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 35 Watt

Solo T1400 has 29.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 6900HS, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen 9 6900HS. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen 9 6900HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1400
Core Solo T1400
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
Ryzen 9 6900HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate Core Solo T1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 137 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 6900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo T1400 or Ryzen 9 6900HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.