Ultra 7 265K vs Solo T1350

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1350 and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	86
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	89.71
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Core Solo	no data
Power efficiency	no data	28.19
Architecture codename	Yonah (2005−2006)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date	January 2006 (18 years ago)	24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1350 and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads	1	20
Base clock speed	1.86 GHz	3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.86 GHz	5.5 GHz
Bus rate	533 MHz	no data
L1 cache	64 KB	112 KB (per core)
L2 cache	2 MB	3 MB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	65 nm	3 nm
Die size	90 mm2	243 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	151 million	17,800 million
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
Unlocked multiplier	-	+
VID voltage range	0.95V-1.262V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1350 and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	PPGA478	1851
Power consumption (TDP)	31 Watt	125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1350 and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
TSX	-	+
Idle States	-	no data
SIPP	-	+
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Core Solo T1350 and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1350 and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	-	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1350 and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1

DDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1350 and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe version	no data	5.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	1	20
Threads	1	20
Chip lithography	65 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	31 Watt	125 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1350 and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---