Atom E660 vs Solo T1350
Aggregate performance score
Core Solo T1350 outperforms Atom E660 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3674 | 3692 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Core Solo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.17 | 1.41 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Tunnel Creek (2010) |
| Release date | January 2006 (20 years ago) | 14 September 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $54 |
Detailed specifications
Core Solo T1350 and Atom E660 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 90 mm2 | 26 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 151 million | 47 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.95V-1.262V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core Solo T1350 and Atom E660 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | Intel BGA 676 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1350 and Atom E660. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core Solo T1350 and Atom E660 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1350 and Atom E660 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1350 and Atom E660. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel GMA 600 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 3 Watt |
Solo T1350 has a 10% higher aggregate performance score.
Atom E660, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 933.3% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Core Solo T1350 and Intel Atom E660.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
