Xeon 6737P vs Solo T1200
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6737P outperforms Core Solo T1200 by a whopping 32400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3628 | 74 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 7.57 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Core Solo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.22 | 7.11 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Granite Rapids (2024−2026) |
| Release date | January 2006 (20 years ago) | 24 February 2025 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,995 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core Solo T1200 and Xeon 6737P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 144 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Die size | 90 mm2 | 598 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 82 °C |
| Number of transistors | 151 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core Solo T1200 and Xeon 6737P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 479 | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 270 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1200 and Xeon 6737P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512, Intel® AMX |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core Solo T1200 and Xeon 6737P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1200 and Xeon 6737P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1200 and Xeon 6737P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR5(6400MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1200 and Xeon 6737P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 88 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.14 | 45.50 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 32 |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 270 Watt |
Solo T1200 has 900% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6737P, on the other hand, has a 32400% higher aggregate performance score, and 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads.
The Intel Xeon 6737P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core Solo T1200 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6737P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
