Ultra 7 256V vs Solo T1200

Place in the ranking	3288	632
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Core Solo	no data
Power efficiency	0.56	67.69
Architecture codename	Yonah (2005−2006)	Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date	January 2006 (18 years ago)	24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1200 and Core Ultra 7 256V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	1	8
Base clock speed	no data	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.5 GHz	4.8 GHz
Bus rate	667 MHz	37 MHz
L1 cache	64 KB	192 KB (per core)
L2 cache	2 MB	2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	65 nm	3 nm
Die size	90 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	no data	100 °C
Number of transistors	151 million	no data
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1200 and Core Ultra 7 256V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	479	Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)	27 Watt	17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core Ultra 7 256V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
TSX	-	+

Security technologies

Core Solo T1200 and Core Ultra 7 256V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core Ultra 7 256V are enumerated here.

VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core Ultra 7 256V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1

DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Arc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core Ultra 7 256V.

PCIe version	no data	5.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.16	12.16
Physical cores	1	8
Threads	1	8
Chip lithography	65 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	27 Watt	17 Watt

Ultra 7 256V has a 7500% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process, and 58.8% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 256V is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1200 and Core Ultra 7 256V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.