A6-9220C vs Solo T1200
Aggregate performance score
A6-9220C outperforms Core Solo T1200 by a whopping 329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3590 | 3046 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Core Solo | AMD Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | no data | 10.73 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | January 2006 (19 years ago) | 7 January 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core Solo T1200 and A6-9220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 18 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 90 mm2 | 124.5 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 151 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Solo T1200 and A6-9220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 479 | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 MB | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1200 and A6-9220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Virtualization, |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1200 and A6-9220C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1200 and A6-9220C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 14.936 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 720 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1200 and A6-9220C.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.14 | 0.60 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 6 Watt |
Solo T1200 has 200% lower power consumption.
A6-9220C, on the other hand, has a 328.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD A6-9220C is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
