i3-10325 vs M-5Y71

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y71
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.28
Core i3-10325
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
6.46
+405%

Core i3-10325 outperforms Core M-5Y71 by a whopping 405% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core M-5Y71 and Core i3-10325 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22901058
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.86
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core Mno data
Power efficiency24.239.41
Architecture codenameBroadwell-Y (2014)Comet Lake-R (2021)
Release date27 October 2014 (10 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$154

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core M-5Y71 and Core i3-10325 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size50 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y71 and Core i3-10325 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1234FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core i3-10325. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core M-5Y71 and Core i3-10325 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core i3-10325 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core i3-10325. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 5300Intel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memory16 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency900 MHz1.15 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core M-5Y71 and Core i3-10325 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core i3-10325 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hz4096 x 2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core i3-10325 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/1212
OpenGL4.34.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core i3-10325.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M-5Y71 1.28
i3-10325 6.46
+405%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

M-5Y71 2037
i3-10325 10268
+404%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 6.46
Integrated graphics card 1.04 3.09
Recency 27 October 2014 16 March 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 65 Watt

M-5Y71 has 1525% lower power consumption.

i3-10325, on the other hand, has a 404.7% higher aggregate performance score, 197.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Core i3-10325 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core M-5Y71 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core M-5Y71 is a notebook processor while Core i3-10325 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y71 and Core i3-10325, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core M-5Y71
Core M-5Y71
Intel Core i3-10325
Core i3-10325

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 31 vote

Rate Core M-5Y71 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 12 votes

Rate Core i3-10325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core M-5Y71 or Core i3-10325, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.