Ultra 9 386H vs M-5Y71

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y71
2014, $281
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.12
Core Ultra 9 386H
2026
16 cores / 16 threads, 25 Watt
19.42
+1634%

Core Ultra 9 386H outperforms Core M-5Y71 by a whopping 1634% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2643372
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core Mno data
Power efficiency9.4532.78
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameBroadwell-Y (2014)Panther Lake (2026)
Release date27 October 2014 (11 years ago)5 January 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core M-5Y71 and Core Ultra 9 386H: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Efficient-coresno data8
Low Power Efficient-coresno data4
Threads416
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache64K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size50 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y71 and Core Ultra 9 386H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1234FCBGA2540
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core Ultra 9 386H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP++
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Core M-5Y71 and Core Ultra 9 386H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core Ultra 9 386H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core Ultra 9 386H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3LPDDR5X-8533, DDR5-7200
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 5300Intel® Graphics
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHz2.5 GHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core M-5Y71 and Core Ultra 9 386H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core Ultra 9 386H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDPno data3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core Ultra 9 386H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12DirectX 12 Ultimate
OpenGL4.34.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y71 and Core Ultra 9 386H.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1220

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

M-5Y71 1.12
Ultra 9 386H 19.42
+1634%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

M-5Y71 1961
Samples: 313
Ultra 9 386H 35307
+1700%
Samples: 26

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 19.42
Recency 27 October 2014 5 January 2026
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 25 Watt

M-5Y71 has 525% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 386H, on the other hand, has a 1634% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core M-5Y71 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 34 votes

Rate Core M-5Y71 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 12 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 386H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core M-5Y71 and Core Ultra 9 386H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.