E2-2000 vs M-5Y51

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y51
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.26
+306%
E2-2000
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.31

Core M-5Y51 outperforms E2-2000 by a whopping 306% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core M-5Y51 and E2-2000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22923087
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core MAMD E-Series
Power efficiency23.851.63
Architecture codenameBroadwell-Y (2014)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date27 October 2014 (10 years ago)6 January 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core M-5Y51 and E2-2000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.75 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm40 nm
Die size50 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y51 and E2-2000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1234FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y51 and E2-2000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core M-5Y51 and E2-2000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y51 and E2-2000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y51 and E2-2000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 5300AMD Radeon HD 7340
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core M-5Y51 and E2-2000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core M-5Y51 and E2-2000 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core M-5Y51 and E2-2000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y51 and E2-2000.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M-5Y51 1.26
+306%
E2-2000 0.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

M-5Y51 2002
+304%
E2-2000 496

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

M-5Y51 655
+355%
E2-2000 144

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

M-5Y51 1122
+316%
E2-2000 270

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.26 0.31
Integrated graphics card 1.04 0.40
Recency 27 October 2014 6 January 2013
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 18 Watt

M-5Y51 has a 306.5% higher aggregate performance score, 160% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

The Core M-5Y51 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-2000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y51 and E2-2000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core M-5Y51
Core M-5Y51
AMD E2-2000
E2-2000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Core M-5Y51 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 56 votes

Rate E2-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core M-5Y51 or E2-2000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.