3020e vs Core M-5Y10c

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y10c
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.23

3020e outperforms M-5Y10c by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core M-5Y10c and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22412020
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core MAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Dali (Zen)
Release date1 December 2014 (9 years ago)4 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data
Current price$454 (1.6x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Core M-5Y10c and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed0.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB192 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y10c and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1234FT5
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y10c and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y10c and 3020e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y10c and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 5300AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y10c and 3020e.

PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M-5Y10c 1.23
3020e 1.58
+28.5%

3020e outperforms Core M-5Y10c by 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

M-5Y10c 1901
3020e 2445
+28.6%

3020e outperforms Core M-5Y10c by 29% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

M-5Y10c 603
3020e 655
+8.6%

3020e outperforms Core M-5Y10c by 9% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

M-5Y10c 1178
+8.5%
3020e 1086

Core M-5Y10c outperforms 3020e by 8% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

M-5Y10c 164
3020e 196
+19.5%

3020e outperforms Core M-5Y10c by 20% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

M-5Y10c 66
3020e 92
+39.4%

3020e outperforms Core M-5Y10c by 39% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 1.58
Integrated graphics card 1.21 2.98
Recency 1 December 2014 4 August 2020
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 6 Watt

M-5Y10c has 100% more threads, and 50% lower power consumption.

3020e, on the other hand, has a 28.5% higher aggregate performance score, 146.3% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 5 years.

The 3020e is our recommended choice as it beats the Core M-5Y10c in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y10c and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core M-5Y10c
Core M-5Y10c
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 29 votes

Rate Core M-5Y10c on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 779 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core M-5Y10c or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.