Ultra 5 236V vs M-5Y10a
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 5 236V outperforms Core M-5Y10a by a whopping 1024% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core M-5Y10a and Core Ultra 5 236V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2353 | 558 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 22.71 | 75.10 |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell-Y (2014) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 5 September 2014 (10 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core M-5Y10a and Core Ultra 5 236V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 4 |
| Low Power Efficient-cores | no data | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 37 MHz |
| Multiplier | 8 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 50 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1300 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core M-5Y10a and Core Ultra 5 236V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1234 | FCBGA2833 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y10a and Core Ultra 5 236V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Smart Response | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
Core M-5Y10a and Core Ultra 5 236V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y10a and Core Ultra 5 236V are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y10a and Core Ultra 5 236V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | Intel Arc Graphics 130V |
| Max video memory | 16 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | 1.85 GHz |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core M-5Y10a and Core Ultra 5 236V integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core M-5Y10a and Core Ultra 5 236V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core M-5Y10a and Core Ultra 5 236V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | 12.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y10a and Core Ultra 5 236V.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 4 |
| PCI support | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.20 | 13.49 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.04 | 11.64 |
| Recency | 5 September 2014 | 24 September 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 17 Watt |
M-5Y10a has 325% lower power consumption.
Ultra 5 236V, on the other hand, has a 1024.2% higher aggregate performance score, 1019.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Core Ultra 5 236V is our recommended choice as it beats the Core M-5Y10a in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y10a and Core Ultra 5 236V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
