Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U vs M-5Y10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y10
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.06
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.76
+255%

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U outperforms M-5Y10 by a whopping 255% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core M-5Y10 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24111462
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core MAMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2014−2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)8 January 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core M-5Y10 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed0.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size82 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y10 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1234AM4
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y10 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core M-5Y10 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y10 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y10 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 5300AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core M-5Y10 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core M-5Y10 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core M-5Y10 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y10 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1212

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M-5Y10 1.06
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U 3.76
+255%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

M-5Y10 1628
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U 5795
+256%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.06 3.76
Integrated graphics card 1.03 3.04
Recency 5 September 2014 8 January 2018
Physical cores 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 15 Watt

M-5Y10 has 275% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, on the other hand, has a 254.7% higher aggregate performance score, 195.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core M-5Y10 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y10 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core M-5Y10
Core M-5Y10
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate Core M-5Y10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 119 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core M-5Y10 or Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.