Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs Duo T2700
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Max (14 cores) outperforms Core Duo T2700 by a whopping 7725% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3325 | 283 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core Duo | Apple M4 |
| Power efficiency | 0.38 | 11.58 |
| Designer | Intel | Apple |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | no data |
| Release date | 28 July 2006 (19 years ago) | 30 November 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $663 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core Duo T2700 and M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2.33 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 4.51 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 90 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 151 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 1.1625V - 1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core Duo T2700 and M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | PPGA478, PBGA479 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2700 and M4 Max (14 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core Duo T2700 and M4 Max (14 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2700 and M4 Max (14 cores) are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo T2700 and M4 Max (14 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M4 32-core GPU |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.28 | 21.91 |
| Recency | 28 July 2006 | 30 November 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 14 |
| Threads | 2 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 80 Watt |
Duo T2700 has 158.1% lower power consumption.
Apple M4 Max (14 cores), on the other hand, has a 7725% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M4 Max (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Duo T2700 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
