E-350 vs Duo T2400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Duo T2400
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.23
E-350
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.27
+17.4%

E-350 outperforms Core Duo T2400 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Duo T2400 and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31903147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore DuoAMD E-Series
Power efficiency0.701.42
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$16no data

Detailed specifications

Core Duo T2400 and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.83 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache0 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm40 nm
Die size90 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1625V - 1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Duo T2400 and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478, PBGA479FT1
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Duo T2400 and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Duo T2400 and E-350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Duo T2400 and E-350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Duo T2400 and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6310

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Duo T2400 0.23
E-350 0.27
+17.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Duo T2400 362
E-350 422
+16.6%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Duo T2400 1488
+45.7%
E-350 1021

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 0.27
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 18 Watt

E-350 has a 17.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 72.2% lower power consumption.

The E-350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Duo T2400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Duo T2400 and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Duo T2400
Core Duo T2400
AMD E-350
E-350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 25 votes

Rate Core Duo T2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 396 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Duo T2400 or E-350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.