5 211E vs 7 253PQE
Aggregate performance score
Core 7 253PQE outperforms Core 5 211E by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 302 | 679 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 33.48 | 29.72 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Bartlett Lake (2025−2026) | Bartlett Lake (2025−2026) |
| Release date | 9 March 2026 (less than a year ago) | 13 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $409 | $221 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
7 253PQE has 13% better value for money than 5 211E.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core 7 253PQE and Core 5 211E: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.7 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 33 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core 7 253PQE and Core 5 211E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 7 253PQE and Core 5 211E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Core 7 253PQE and Core 5 211E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 7 253PQE and Core 5 211E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 7 253PQE and Core 5 211E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Intel UHD Graphics 730 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 7 253PQE and Core 5 211E.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 24.08 | 13.77 |
| Integrated graphics card | 5.75 | 3.88 |
| Recency | 9 March 2026 | 13 January 2025 |
| Threads | 20 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
7 253PQE has a 75% higher aggregate performance score, 48% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 25% more threads.
5 211E, on the other hand, has 92% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core 7 253PQE is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 5 211E in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
