A4-9120C vs 7 245HX
Aggregate performance score
Core 7 245HX outperforms A4-9120C by a whopping 4645% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 312 | 3254 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Arrow Lake | AMD Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | no data | 3.49 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-HX (2025−2026) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 1 April 2026 (less than a year ago) | 6 January 2019 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core 7 245HX and A4-9120C: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 14 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | no data | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 24 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 26 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 124.5 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 7 245HX and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 7 245HX and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Virtualization, |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 7 245HX and A4-9120C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 7 245HX and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 14.936 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (300 - 1800 MHz) | AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 24.20 | 0.51 |
| Recency | 1 April 2026 | 6 January 2019 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 2 |
| Threads | 14 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 28 nm |
7 245HX has a 4645% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 833% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Core 7 245HX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4-9120C in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
