Atom C3958 vs 7 230H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 7 230H
2026
10 cores / 16 threads
14.33
+523%

Core 7 230H outperforms Atom C3958 by a whopping 523% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6732155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.10
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HIntel Atom
Power efficiencyno data3.07
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-H (2023−2026)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date12 June 2026 (less than a year ago)15 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core 7 230H and Atom C3958: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz2 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache864 KB896 KB
L2 cache9.5 MB16 MB
L3 cache24 MB16 MB
Chip lithography10 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core 7 230H and Atom C3958 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1700FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)no data31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 7 230H and Atom C3958. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Core 7 230H and Atom C3958 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 7 230H and Atom C3958 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 7 230H and Atom C3958. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4: 2400
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 7 230H and Atom C3958.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

7 230H 14.33
+523%
Atom C3958 2.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

7 230H 24533
+524%
Samples: 3
Atom C3958 3929
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.33 2.30
Recency 12 June 2026 15 August 2017
Physical cores 10 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm

7 230H has a 523% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Atom C3958, on the other hand, has 60% more physical cores.

The Intel Core 7 230H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom C3958 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 7 230H is a notebook processor while Atom C3958 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 7 230H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Atom C3958 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 7 230H and Atom C3958, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.