Xeon 6736P vs 7 160UL
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6736P outperforms Core 7 160UL by a whopping 354% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1211 | 199 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 17.70 | 5.87 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | no data |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (1 year ago) | 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 7 160UL and Xeon 6736P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 36 |
| Threads | 12 | 72 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 144 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 87 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 7 160UL and Xeon 6736P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 1700 | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 7 160UL and Xeon 6736P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512, Intel® AMX |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core 7 160UL and Xeon 6736P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 7 160UL and Xeon 6736P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 7 160UL and Xeon 6736P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5(6400MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 7 160UL and Xeon 6736P.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 88 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.28 | 28.49 |
| Recency | 8 April 2024 | 1 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 36 |
| Threads | 12 | 72 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 205 Watt |
7 160UL has 1266.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6736P, on the other hand, has a 353.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 260% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
The Intel Xeon 6736P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 7 160UL in performance tests.
Note that Core 7 160UL is a desktop processor while Xeon 6736P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
