Xeon W-1290E vs 5 220H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 5 220H
2024, $342
12 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
12.37
+11.4%
Xeon W-1290E
2020, $552
10 cores / 20 threads, 95 Watt
11.10

Core 5 220H outperforms Xeon W-1290E by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking726840
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.068.91
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency11.604.93
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-H (2023−2024)Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Release date18 December 2024 (1 year ago)13 May 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$342$552

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

5 220H has 226% better value for money than Xeon W-1290E.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core 5 220H and Xeon W-1290E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Performance-cores4no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Threads1620
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache18 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data206 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C70 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Core 5 220H and Xeon W-1290E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA17441200
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 5 220H and Xeon W-1290E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core 5 220H and Xeon W-1290E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 5 220H and Xeon W-1290E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 5 220H and Xeon W-1290E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267DDR4
Maximum memory size96 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics P630
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.5 GHzno data
Execution Units80no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 5 220H and Xeon W-1290E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core 5 220H and Xeon W-1290E integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core 5 220H and Xeon W-1290E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 5 220H and Xeon W-1290E.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

5 220H 12.37
+11.4%
Xeon W-1290E 11.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

5 220H 21649
+11.5%
Samples: 20
Xeon W-1290E 19424
Samples: 18

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.37 11.10
Recency 18 December 2024 13 May 2020
Physical cores 12 10
Threads 16 20
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 95 Watt

5 220H has a 11.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 20% more physical cores, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 111.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-1290E, on the other hand, has 25% more threads.

The Intel Core 5 220H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon W-1290E in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 5 220H is a notebook processor while Xeon W-1290E is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H
Intel Xeon W-1290E
Xeon W-1290E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 64 votes

Rate Core 5 220H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-1290E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 5 220H and Xeon W-1290E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.