Xeon 6960E+ vs 3 305
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1083 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 13.19 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 24.71 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Wildcat Lake (2026) | Clearwater Forest (2026) |
| Release date | 16 April 2026 (less than a year ago) | 31 May 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $309 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core 3 305 and Xeon 6960E+: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 144 |
| Threads | 6 | 144 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 4 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 432 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core 3 305 and Xeon 6960E+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1516 | 7529 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 330 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 3 305 and Xeon 6960E+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Core 3 305 and Xeon 6960E+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 3 305 and Xeon 6960E+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 3 305 and Xeon 6960E+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 3 305 and Xeon 6960E+.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 16 April 2026 | 31 May 2026 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 144 |
| Threads | 6 | 144 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 330 Watt |
Core 3 305 has 2100% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6960E+, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core 3 305 and Intel Xeon 6960E+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 3 305 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6960E+ is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
