EPYC 9454 vs Core 2 Solo ULV U2200
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 50 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 7.82 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 18.45 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Merom-L (2007) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | September 2007 (18 years ago) | 10 November 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $5,225 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo ULV U2200 and EPYC 9454 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.75 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 27.5 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 8x 72 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 291 million | 52,560 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo ULV U2200 and EPYC 9454 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 956 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 290 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo ULV U2200 and EPYC 9454. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo ULV U2200 and EPYC 9454 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo ULV U2200 and EPYC 9454. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 460.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo ULV U2200 and EPYC 9454.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 48 |
| Threads | 1 | 96 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 290 Watt |
Core 2 Solo ULV U2200 has 5700% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9454, on the other hand, has 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core 2 Solo ULV U2200 and AMD EPYC 9454. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Solo ULV U2200 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9454 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
