Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Core 2 Solo SU3500
Aggregate performance score
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3500 by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3268 | 2882 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Solo | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) | May 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $262 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 220 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 154 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.15V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA956 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 89 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.17 | 0.50 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 89 Watt |
Core 2 Solo SU3500 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1680% lower power consumption.
Athlon 64 X2 5000+, on the other hand, has a 194.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
The Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo SU3500 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Solo SU3500 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
