EPYC 9374F vs Core 2 Solo SU3300
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9374F outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3300 by a whopping 30893% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3581 | 62 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 8.16 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Solo | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 1.16 | 6.17 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 20 August 2008 (17 years ago) | 10 November 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $262 | $4,850 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 9374F have a nearly equal value for money.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 9374F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.85 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 38.5 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 8x 72 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 52,560 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 9374F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | BGA956 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 320 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 9374F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 9374F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 9374F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 460.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and EPYC 9374F.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 46.49 |
| Recency | 20 August 2008 | 10 November 2022 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 32 |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 320 Watt |
Core 2 Solo SU3300 has 6300% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9374F, on the other hand, has a 30893.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 9374F is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Solo SU3300 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9374F is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
