Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Core 2 Solo SL3400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SL3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated91
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data97.37
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data27.98
Architecture codenameno dataArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SL3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speed1.86 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5.5 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data3 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SL3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA9561851
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SL3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
TSX-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Solo SL3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SL3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SL3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo SL3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2009 24 October 2024
Physical cores 1 20
Threads 1 20
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 125 Watt

Core 2 Solo SL3400 has 635.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 1900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Solo SL3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Solo SL3400 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SL3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SL3400
Core 2 Solo SL3400
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Solo SL3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 46 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SL3400 or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.