Xeon Silver 4310 vs Core 2 Quad Q9650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9650
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.60
Xeon Silver 4310
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
14.64
+815%

Xeon Silver 4310 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9650 by a whopping 815% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9650 and Xeon Silver 4310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2007459
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.4319.61
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release dateAugust 2008 (15 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$75 $1108

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4310 has 1271% better value for money than Core 2 Quad Q9650.

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9650 and Xeon Silver 4310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (per die)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C82 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data82 °C
Number of transistors820 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9650 and Xeon Silver 4310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and Xeon Silver 4310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9650 and Xeon Silver 4310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and Xeon Silver 4310 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and Xeon Silver 4310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-2667
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and Xeon Silver 4310.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9650 1.60
Xeon Silver 4310 14.64
+815%

Xeon Silver 4310 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9650 by 815% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Quad Q9650 2472
Xeon Silver 4310 22642
+816%

Xeon Silver 4310 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9650 by 816% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Quad Q9650 383
Xeon Silver 4310 1196
+212%

Xeon Silver 4310 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9650 by 212% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Quad Q9650 1077
Xeon Silver 4310 7598
+605%

Xeon Silver 4310 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9650 by 605% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.60 14.64
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 120 Watt

The Xeon Silver 4310 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9650 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9650 is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4310 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9650 and Xeon Silver 4310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Core 2 Quad Q9650
Intel Xeon Silver 4310
Xeon Silver 4310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1554 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 25 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9650 or Xeon Silver 4310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.