FX-9800P vs Core 2 Quad Q9650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9650
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.60

FX-9800P outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9650 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-9800P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20482029
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-9800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)320 KB
L2 cache6 MB (per die)1 MB (per module)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C90 °C
Number of transistors820 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-9800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket775FP4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-9800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-9800P are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-9800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3, DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-9800P.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9650 1.60
FX-9800P 1.64
+2.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9650 2473
FX-9800P 2543
+2.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q9650 380
FX-9800P 496
+30.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q9650 1068
FX-9800P 1119
+4.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.60 1.64
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

FX-9800P has a 2.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-9800P.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9650 is a desktop processor while FX-9800P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-9800P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Core 2 Quad Q9650
AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1572 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 43 votes

Rate FX-9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9650 or FX-9800P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.