FX-6200 vs Core 2 Quad Q9650

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9650
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.56
FX-6200
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.57
+64.7%

FX-6200 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9650 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-6200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21221746
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.551.95
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)27 February 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-6200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)288 KB
L2 cache6 MB (per die)6144 KB
L3 cache0 KB8192 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C61 °C
Number of transistors820 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-6200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-6200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-6200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-6200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-6200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-6200.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9650 1.56
FX-6200 2.57
+64.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9650 2479
FX-6200 4075
+64.4%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q9650 378
FX-6200 409
+8.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q9650 1061
FX-6200 1299
+22.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.56 2.57
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 6
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9650 has 31.6% lower power consumption.

FX-6200, on the other hand, has a 64.7% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The FX-6200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9650 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9650 and FX-6200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Core 2 Quad Q9650
AMD FX-6200
FX-6200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1634 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 135 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9650 or FX-6200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.