EPYC 9174F vs Core 2 Quad Q9550s
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 183 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 7.37 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 4.03 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 27 January 2009 (17 years ago) | 10 November 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,850 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad Q9550s and EPYC 9174F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.83 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 41 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | 2x 107 mm2 | 8x 72 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 76 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 820 million | 52,560 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad Q9550s and EPYC 9174F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | LGA775 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 320 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9550s and EPYC 9174F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Quad Q9550s and EPYC 9174F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9550s and EPYC 9174F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9550s and EPYC 9174F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 460.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9550s and EPYC 9174F.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 January 2009 | 10 November 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 320 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q9550s has 392% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9174F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550s and AMD EPYC 9174F. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q9550s is a desktop processor while EPYC 9174F is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
