Pentium 4 HT 641 vs Core 2 Quad Q9550

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Pentium 4 HT 641 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2154not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Quad (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.46no data
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Cedar Mill (2006)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Pentium 4 HT 641 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed2.83 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data28 KB
L2 cache12288 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data188 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Pentium 4 HT 641 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt86 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Pentium 4 HT 641. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1,DDR2,DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 86 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9550 has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium 4 HT 641, on the other hand, has 10.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9550 and Pentium 4 HT 641. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9550 and Pentium 4 HT 641, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
Core 2 Quad Q9550
Intel Pentium 4 HT 641
Pentium 4 HT 641

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1862 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 42 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 641 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9550 or Pentium 4 HT 641, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.