Mobile Pentium 4 538 vs Core 2 Quad Q9550
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Mobile Pentium 4 538 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2128 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Core 2 Quad (Desktop) | Mobile Pentium 4 |
| Power efficiency | 1.48 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Prescott (2001−2005) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Mobile Pentium 4 538 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L2 cache | 12288 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Mobile Pentium 4 538 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | LGA775 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 88 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and Mobile Pentium 4 538. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1,DDR2,DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 88 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q9550 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile Pentium 4 538, on the other hand, has 8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9550 and Mobile Pentium 4 538. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q9550 is a desktop processor while Mobile Pentium 4 538 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9550 and Mobile Pentium 4 538, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
