GX-210UA vs Core 2 Quad Q9550
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2439 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Core 2 Quad (Desktop) | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| Release date | no data | 23 April 2013 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and GX-210UA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12288 KB | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 2x 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 820 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and GX-210UA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | FT3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 MB | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and GX-210UA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and GX-210UA are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and GX-210UA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1,DDR2,DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550 and GX-210UA.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 9 Watt |
Core 2 Quad Q9550 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
GX-210UA, on the other hand, has a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 and AMD GX-210UA. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Quad Q9550 is a desktop processor while GX-210UA is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
