EPYC 73F3 vs Core 2 Quad Q9505S

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9505S and EPYC 73F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated152
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.26
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data11.45
Architecture codenameno dataMilan (2021−2023)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,521

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9505S and EPYC 73F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threadsno data32
Base clock speed2.83 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
Multiplierno data35
L1 cacheno data1 MB
L2 cacheno data8 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9505S and EPYC 73F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketLGA775SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505S and EPYC 73F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9505S and EPYC 73F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505S and EPYC 73F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505S and EPYC 73F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad Q9505S and EPYC 73F3.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2009 12 January 2021
Physical cores 4 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 240 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9505S has 269.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 73F3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9505S and EPYC 73F3. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9505S is a desktop processor while EPYC 73F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9505S and EPYC 73F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505S
Core 2 Quad Q9505S
AMD EPYC 73F3
EPYC 73F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 8 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9505S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 73F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9505S or EPYC 73F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.